Soft Moss

I read an article recently that suggested we get many more net calories from soft processed food than from non-processed food. That we get more calories from a soft granola bar listed with 160 calories than from an apple listed at 160 calories.
The difference being that we use up few calories digesting the granola bar than we do the apple (so calories in minus calories needed to digest) is more. And that the softer processed food also is more thoroughly digested.
I’ll need to look up how food calories are calculated. I can see that if they are calculated using the old “burn the food and see how much heat is given off” method of physics books it would give a biologically unrealistic value.

Advertisements

About mutecypher

Old. Bold. Deal with it.
This entry was posted in Musings. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Soft Moss

  1. Steve says:

    I’ve wondered how they figure net caloric intake for food myself. I’ve heard that if you feed your dog Alpo Beef Chunks Dinner it has so much protein in it that dogs will eat the feces afterwards. So I assume there is some residual calorie value to the waste. It that ever taken into account?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s